Current Archives/Historical Preservation
Activities
The purpose of this document is to maintain an ongoing digital representation and record via the Web of current efforts to preserve the history of MMUUS and maintain a corresponding archival collection. The associated documents are presented in chronological order.
Roger Hiemstra, MMUUS Archivist
Document 1
To Barbara Mihalas, President, and Members of the Board of Trustees, MMUUS
Archival/Historical Preservation Needs: May Memorial Unitarian
Universalist Society
From Roger Hiemstra,
Introduction
Over a year ago Gary Droege and I had a conversation about my assuming responsibilities as the church archivist. I had directed a large project at Syracuse University related to archival preservation nearly two decades ago and maintain an interest in archives and history. I also created the Sam May material (with the help of others) and link on our web page (http://www.mmuus.org/) so he knew of that involvement. Thus, I accepted the role.
The purpose of this report is to present background information, provide information on the current status of our archival and historical preservation needs, and provide several future recommendations.
Background
As you may know, former MMUUS member, Jean Hoefer, who had a long involvement with the church, undertook activities over a decade ago related to archival and historical preservation. There no doubt have been previous related efforts, but I am unaware of them at this point.
Jean
coordinated the involvement of Dr. Suzanne Etherington, a Certified Archivist,
in carrying out an initial survey of the church’s existing archives and making
recommendations for our future handling of such materials. Her subsequent
report entitled, “Report on Phase One of the May Memorial Unitarian Society
Archival Records Management Project,” is dated
In this report Dr. Etherington, based on a site visit and most likely conversations with Jean and others, made observations about our archives and a number of recommendations. She makes two observations with implications for us that stood out to me:
· The historical records and documents currently housed in the basement, the multi-use room on the first floor, and in the loft area are at risk (italics added by me). The storage conditions are well below archival standards (italics added by me) both in terms of micro-climate and storage containers. (p. 12)
· . . . considerable funding as well as volunteer labor (italicized words added by me) for collection management and preservation would be required, along with secure and appropriate space for storage and research use. (p. 12)
In March, 1995, Jean submitted a
copy of the above report to Dr. Mark Weimer, Special Collections head, Syracuse
University Library (her cover letter is attached to the report noted above).
She, in conjunction with June Card and perhaps others, had subsequent
conversations with various library officials. This resulted in an official
agreement between MMUUS and the SU Library to organize, preserve, and make
accessible to future generations our archives. A copy of this agreement (Appendix
B) and Jean’s
Following
this, Jean, June, and perhaps others began a process of selecting materials for
preservation. Two batches of materials were subsequently deposited with the SU
Library in July of 1995 and July of 1998. Copies of the listings of these
materials obtained from the SU library are also attached (Appendix D). Jean
notes in her letter to
My Involvement to Date
The three people associated with
archives that I knew and worked with at SU nearly two decades ago (Mark Weimer,
Carolyn Davis, and Terry Keenan) have all retired or ended their involvement
with the Archives. However, I recently met with Carolyn Davis’ replacement,
Nicolette Schneider (Reference and Access Services Library,
I also spent about 30 minutes in the church basement furnace room where the bulk of our archival records are kept. There are 7 file cabinets (each having 4 drawers), 6 boxes, and 3 metal file drawers where archival or historically important materials may be kept (some drawers are locked and others are difficult to access). Some drawers are marked as “Eras” or with historical material. Others contain such files as old records of church groups, newsletters, minister’s materials, RE materials, and archival project materials, any of which may contain historically important information. A rough guestimation is that there exists 6-10 linear feet of files and other material, perhaps more, that would need to be perused to determine if they have historical or archival significance.
The Etherington report notes that material of potential archival importance also exists in the loft and in the Memorial Room. In a recent conversation with Alexa Carter, she reported seeing at least 4 albums in the Memorial Room that contain photographs and other potentially important information that are not being carefully preserved. Jean Hoefer and Irene Baros-Johnson also discovered that various archival materials related to MMUUS and past ministers are located in the Onondaga Historical Society, UUA Library, and Harvard Library. There may be additional material in such libraries and in other libraries that we might like to access or electronically link to if there is known digital storage of useful information. For example, the Samuel J. May Anti-Slavery collection exists at the Cornell Library (http://www.library.cornell.edu/mayantislavery/); the University of Michigan contains digital copies of two books on Sam May (see the Sam May web page); the SU library houses the Lilian Reiner papers.
Finally, in that recent conversation with Alexa, who is a member of the New York Board of Universalists, she indicated that the group has monies available for training people who are interested in archival and historical preservations of church materials. Former Minister of Religious Education Liz Strong has been involved in encouraging such training. There are no doubt other MMUUS members with interest and expertise in archival preservation who would be likely candidates for such training and subsequent work, but I am willing to continue my involvement if that would be of value.
Several Recommendations
Based on the information shown above, my thinking about the topic to date, and the phone conversation with Alexa, I offer the following recommendations:
Appendix A
Appendix B
MMUUS-Syracuse University Agreement
Appendix C
Document 2
Preserving, Perpetuating, and Using the MMUUS Archives
Executive Summary
Roger Hiemstra, Church Archivist
MMUUS members have preserved much of the church’s history for the past 170 years. In addition, Samuel May’s prestige as a national religious figure has meant that considerable information about him has been preserved, too, in the form of books, articles, research papers, and even his own writings. Some of the corresponding archival material is now stored at the Syracuse University Arents Library and some of it is still stored in our church building.
Unfortunately, much of the material residing at MMUUS is deteriorating for various reasons. To prevent further deterioration, we must send more of it to SU and do a better job of preserving what remains here. If the history of the church is to serve as resource for current and future generations to study, we also must put better procedures into place for perpetuating as well as preserving our archives.
In that regard, I make the following recommendations and request appropriate board action (see the full report for more detail on these recommendations):
Preserving, Perpetuating, and Using the MMUUS Archives
Roger Hiemstra, Church Archivist
Background Information
May Memorial members have been interested in preserving knowledge about our church through the creation of written histories and the compilation of official archives for much of our nearly 170 years. Various kinds of records have been kept since 1838 regarding our finances, Board of Trustee meetings, and various other church activities. A variety of sermons have been maintained since at least 1858. Because of his national prestige, various books, articles, and research papers were published about Sam May, some of which we have in our archives. The first written church history may have been completed around 1917. A centennial history of May Memorial was developed in 1938. Other church histories were created periodically after that date, with the most notable being May No One Be A Stranger written by Jean M. Hoefer and Irene Baros-Johnson and published by the church in 1988.
The first official archival activities may have been the work of Jean I. Simpson, “Historian for the Archives,” and Doris McLennan, “Historian for the Scrapbooks.” In 1972 they organized our various records and other material into eras by ministerial time periods, stored most of them in filing cabinets located in our furnace room, and produced a notebook detailing what they had stored. Then in 1994 Jean Hoefer arranged for Dr. Suzanne Etherington, a Certified Archivist, to carry out an initial survey of the archives and make recommendations for future preservation activities. Dr. Etherington’s October 7, 1994, report (see Appendix A-1) noted the precarious nature of our archives due to inadequate storage facilities (old filing cabinets, boxes, and chest drawers), material stored in at least three locations, a lack of acid free containers, and the potential for damage or decay due to insects, rodents, light, and moisture. She made several recommendations, many of which have never been addressed.
After the report, a request was made to the Board of Trustees in a 1995 letter (incorrectly dated as January 8, 1994) by John Chamberlin, Jean Hoefer, and Liz Strong that urged a motion be passed to do the following (see Appendix A-2):
Offer MMUUS historical records and documents to a safe repository such as Syracuse University Arents Library, or the Syracuse Public Library, or the Onondaga Historical Society.
Such a motion must have been passed because Jean Hoefer and
June Card worked with Terry Keenan and Mark Weimer,
Jean Hoefer
and June Card pulled together various materials after the board action and they
were transmitted to
As the
original agreement (Appendix B) stipulated that MMUUS and the SU Library needed
to review the archival arrangements every five years, beginning in 2000, 2005
is the year that we must go through that review process and, hopefully,
continue our arrangements so that another batch of material can be transmitted
soon. I compiled two prior reports on
Where Are We Now?
I begin this section with a personal opinion. I believe we should think about the value of our archives in two ways. First, because we have quite an outstanding archival collection, even given the limitations noted in the prior section, there is value in thinking about ways we can encourage its use by current and future scholars. Second, the national prestige of Samuel J. May, both during his lifetime and after his death, gives MMUUS a connection to a treasured heritage that should be further exploited.
Related to this second point, I compiled a list of collections and references pertaining to Sam May (see Appendix F). It is no doubt very incomplete, but it provides some evidence to support my contention regarding the prestige of Sam May. In addition, rediscovery of the large marble tablet honoring Sam that was created after his death (see page 3 of Appendix E) presents MMUUS with a unique opportunity. I have later recommendations related to these first two paragraphs.
I have spent approximately five hours assessing what we currently have in our church building that is of historical value. Appendix G provides a summary. In essence, virtually no progress has been made since Jean and June completed their efforts some time in 1998 (the last year shown in their written notes). In that time there has been continual deterioration of most items and some may even have disappeared.
Perhaps even more disturbing, there is very little evidence that the collection and preservation of items of historical value have taken place during the past several years, other than a few sermons, papers, and records added to some drawers or boxes in the furnace room. To my knowledge, no new scrap books containing photos, newspaper clippings, and mementos from church events have been compiled for years. Bob Burdick and a few others have taken photos of people and events during this time period, but there has not been a systematic compilation and associated identification of the people in any such photos. In many ways, we are “losing” our recent history, especially as church members die or move away.
I also have begun to digitize (OCR scanning) some records compiled by Jean and Joan for future safekeeping, but much more needs to be done. Through the advice of Alexa Carter and from a search on the Web, I’ve identified two organizations that may be funding sources to assist in future archival preservation efforts:
I also have later recommendations related to these two organizations.
What Should We Do?
I have
attempted to make the case that as an organization we must move quickly to
accomplish the following: (a) Better preserve our existing archives, (b)
recapture as much of our history as possible that has been lost during the past
several years, (c) put into place various mechanisms and procedures for
ensuring an appropriate gathering of “archival” information in the future, and
(d) transmit additional material to Syracuse University. I also placed the word
“using” in the title of this report because I firmly believe in the value of
actively encouraging use of an existing archive. Anyone interested in the
liberal religious heritage of Unitarian Universalist both within the
In that regard, I make the following recommendations and request appropriate board action. Unless otherwise noted, I am willing to take the initial leadership in carrying out a stated recommendation if that is the Board of Trustees’ desire.
Preserving our history unites current MMUUS members and friends with those who have gone before during our nearly 170 years. The vibrant nature of this church as a leader in liberal religion, social justice, and the protection of human rights throughout much of this area’s history needs constant celebration. Such vibrancy will continue and it is our responsibility to preserve this history to the best of our ability so that MMUUS members cherish what we have been, currently are, and can become far into the future.
Appendix A-1
Appendix A-2
Appendix B
MMUUS-Syracuse University Agreement
Appendix C
MMUUS Archive Materials at Syracuse University Library
Appendix D
Appendix E
Appendix F
Samuel J. May Collections and References
Appendix G
Current Status of our In-Church
Archives
Document 3
First Report of Archivist Activities
Archivist
Activities --
Following is a
summary of the archival activities completed during the past three months:
Rog Hiemstra, Archivist
Document 4
Second Report of Archivist Activities
Archivist
Activities –
Following is a summary of the archival activities completed
since
1.
Submitted
a summary of my recent activities to Barbara Mihalas.
2.
We were awarded a portion
($3200) of the grant application submitted to the New York State Convention of
Universalists. That money has now been requested and should arrive shortly. A
revised budget has been developed that will focus mainly on preservation of our
existing archives, placing a system in place for future development of our
archives, and repair and mounting of the Sam May tablet.
3.
An archival
committee has been formed to assist with some of the activities mentioned
above. This committee consists of George Adams, June Card, Mary Louise Edwards,
Frank Healey, and Harsey Leonard. We will have our first meeting on March 15.
4.
The
second history display was held in the social hall on February 19.
5.
A
“History” column has been placed in the newsletter each time.
6.
I have
made my way through about three-fourths of the MMUUS archives located at
7.
I have
developed a “history” web page that Bob Schultz will place on the MMUUS web
page in the near future. As of now, this information is temporarily available
at http://www-distance.syr.edu/simulationpage.html
.
8.
Mariah
Dillon and Michael Stafford-Hill have been instrumental in moving the archive
filing cabinets to the basement computer room. That task is mostly completed.
9.
The
10. I have compiled a list of most of the past
May Memorial presidents and many of the past annual award winners. Once that
list is complete I will propose to the BOT some ways we can display such
information.
11. Finally, on March I will participate in a
training session on preservation techniques
Rog Hiemstra, Archivist
Document 5
History Committee Formation
A history committee comprised of
George Adams, June Card, Mary Louise Edwards, Frank Henley, Roger Hiemstra
(chair), and Harsey Leonard was formed and met in the computer room for the
first time on
Attachment A
History Committee, First Meeting,
Comments and Reflections on the Meeting
After becoming better acquainted with each other, Roger described the various known locations of archival material and reflected on where other material might be. He described the types of material kept in the various file drawers.
There was a brief discussion of the NYSCU grant which led to considerable
discussion of the need for developing a system and policy for identifying what
we currently have and for gathering, prioritizing, and preserving future
information to be obtained. We talked about creating databases, identifying
appropriate software, and digitizing some of the information we currently have.
Frank will gather some information from
Frank urged Roger to think through the informal processes he has been using thus far in working with and better understanding the archival collections as a means for thinking about creating some of the processes described above.
We spent some time brainstorming about the first draft of a statement for the Operating Manual. Roger is to create a second draft and send it to the committee for further reflection.
Roger also talked about obtaining the services of a locksmith to make sure all file cabinets (including the fire proof cabinet remaining in the furnace room) are in working order, lockable, and that multiple copies of the key are made for committee members and key church leaders.
We concluded by talking about some individual activities committee members could undertake based on their available time. Based on that discussion and in reflecting on what is needed over the next several months, the following assignments are suggested below:
As the meeting ended we viewed the
Sam May Marble Tablet. Roger agreed to work on establishing a second
meeting. Roger Hiemstra, Archivist,
Attachment B
HISTORY COMMITTEE
Statement to be Used in the Operating Manual
Purpose: The History Committee works to oversee the identification, gathering, preservation, and protection of information, material, and artifacts pertinent to the history of May Memorial.
Committee Structure: The structure and operation of the committee shall be governed by the following:
1. The History Committee shall consist of five to seven people, all of whom are MMUUS members in good standing or who have made an annual pledge of record.
2. The church archivist will be considered an additional member of the committee and serve as its chair for organizational and reporting purposes.
3. Each committee member will serve a minimum of a two years, unless an early resignation is requested, and may serve an unlimited number of years after that time period.
4. Robert’s Rules of Order will be followed in the conduct of committee meetings. For voting purposes, a quorum will consist of at least four people.
5. A vice chair and recorder will be elected by majority vote, with the length of term open-ended based on personal preference.
General Responsibilities: The responsibilities of the History Committee and church archivist shall include the following:
1. Develop a record management policy for systematically gathering information related to the “ongoing” history of MMUUS.
a. Develop and maintain a written record management policy, preservation plan, mission statement, long term strategy, and corresponding implementation guidelines.
b. Determine the various locations where church archival material are stored.
c. To the extent possible, consolidate such material into one location.
d. Determine the location of past photographs, slides, and other visual material related to church activities, leadership, ministers, and parishioners.
e. To the extent possible, identify the names of all people shown in such visual material.
f. Create a corresponding organizational system of information pertaining to the above points.
g. Create an index or catalog that details what the church has of historical value and where it is located.
h. Implement appropriate procedures pertaining to the above points.
2. Gather new archival and historical information about May Memorial from approximately 1990 forward, as well as seeking prior information not already contained within our archival collections.
a. Seek historical information from current and past church members.
b. Find
or photocopy newspaper clippings and other similar information pertaining to
church activities and individuals utilizing the
c. Create